Search This Blog

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Problem with thesis submission

All this while, I thought I would not draw any of the onion series again... 
However, the recent tragedy that had happened to me which had caused me to have such agony and stress that I had fallen sick for 2 consecutive weeks. Now that is a serious problem, a huge problem....

I had tried to get my thesis submitted to school. A couple of months ago, I asked the so called personal in charge managing the research in the school about the thesis binding and etc. Not to my surprise, a standard typical answer will be given which is " I am not sure, you can check the given website and follow the guidelines", "I have no preference, it is all up to you", "Can I get back to you in a day or two, I need to check with the OZ side" and etc. I made my own decision and asked a senior whom had submitted regarding to the initial submission and guidelines. After much awaiting weeks for submission (the OZ side was having holiday seasons), I could finally send in.... Yet, I had this devastating feedback which was my binding was not accepted and please redo to be hard cover hard bound (with the I'm not sure, it's up to you typical answer) by the person-in-charge. I was totally shocked. How on earth an initial submission was to submit in hard cover hard bound? It will be a waste of time and a waste of money, totally INSANE?! I tried to negotiate and even pointed how the previous recent submission being done and accepted. The person-in-charge told me, the recent submission was done in hard cover hard bound. I was SHOCKED! The very same senior told me she did not submit in hard cover hard bound. Now, how did this person-in-charge forgotten the recent submission looks like, if she is the one handling it? My own presumption was that recent submission had been given to the assistant of who-so-ever the person-in-charge can get to hand it over.

I made numerous email to the OZ side to inquire about the initial binding and at last, I had the answer that stapler binding or sew binding is accepted. I called to the person-in-charge in the morning to double confirm and by the time I asked regarding to the matter, I immediately receive the forwarded email (I had the gmail page on to check if there is any incoming email). No doubt, the email was forwarded after I made the call.

Just when I thought everything goes well... I received an email stated that the appointed examiner was invalid due to conflict of interest. I was totally speechless and shocked. I had asked the person-in-charge if my appointed examiners were valid and accepted, and she replied the system had accepted the nomination and is waiting for me to submit my thesis. The notification email came in late to me as well. I received the forwarded email on 18/01/2013 and the OZ had send the email to the person-in-charge and my PI on 11/01/2013. I had a week blank and I was not informed at all until the person-in-charge did not get any respond from my PI. I would say, my PI do have the responsibility to at least check the email and had it forward to me; but my PI did not. When I forward the same email to both PIs (A&B) and one of them  (B) responded that the other PI had the new examiner list, it was a relief. Not too soon my relief ended by an email from the PI (A) stating that I have to asked the other PI (B) whom shall I nominate to fasten the process...(I thought the other PI (B) had discussed with PI (A) and issue settled?) A few minutes later, a follow-up email by PI (A) that he will send in email to the person-in-charge to rectify the issue.

What is your verdict? I had yet to check my email and I will login after this to have a quick look.

p/s: Everyone's case is a new case to the person-in-charge and she will forever, eternally use the same typical answer - She's new to the case, your case is unique, let me get back to you, it's all up to you... and etc. In case of inquiries, I would suggest to ask the OZ side directly to get the definite answer and show her the proof.


Friday, January 11, 2013

SPRT T3 mini mobile Bluetooth printers by Imprimer Magnat


If one is looking for a portable mini size Bluetooth printer, there is a company in Malaysia that provides such device.

Type in Imprimer Magnat - SPRT Mobile Bluetooth Printer Malaysia or just click into the hyper-link and you will find attractive promotions given by Imprimer Magnat.

SPRT T3 mobile Bluetooth printer is suitable for on-site billing such as printing parking receipt, sales and service receipt, pocket size reminder, letter, and a lot more according to your applications. For mini portable size printer, it can print 32 & 42 characters per line, total weigh about 275 g with rechargeable Li-ion 1.5 AH battery and the print head life last up to 50 km printing.

To find out more about SPRT TIII portable mobile printer in Malaysia, do click into the hyper-link to join the Facebook page.

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

SKMM-registration for RM200 phone rebate

I had read through news, regarding to the phone rebate given by the government to enable employee or students whom earn less than RM3000 per month to have a 3G smart phone.

Click into the SKMM website.

Select either students or employee according to your current status.

Just fill in whatever that is necessary in the application form and all you need is patience. Try to click to register as frequent as you may (for those whom had fail to register after the first click).

I had clicked a few times, and I indeed had given up on it. However, before I log out from the page, I tried again for the very last time. Only God knows... the last click was successfully done and had my name registered into the system. There an application rebate slip was generated to the applicant. Do take a look at the example given with all the confidential column blacken for privacy purpose.